Browse Source

[2726] Explicitly call the default constructor

This is no difference in the code, as the default constructor would be
called implicitly, but cppcheck warned about not calling one.
Michal 'vorner' Vaner 12 years ago
parent
commit
43fae7e836
1 changed files with 1 additions and 0 deletions
  1. 1 0
      src/lib/datasrc/tests/client_list_unittest.cc

+ 1 - 0
src/lib/datasrc/tests/client_list_unittest.cc

@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ public:
         rrclass_(RRClass::IN()),
         // The empty list corresponds to a list with no elements inside
         list_(new TestedList(rrclass_)),
+        negative_result_(),
         config_elem_(Element::fromJSON("["
             "{"
             "   \"type\": \"test_type\","