This is no difference in the code, as the default constructor would be called implicitly, but cppcheck warned about not calling one.
@@ -125,6 +125,7 @@ public:
rrclass_(RRClass::IN()),
// The empty list corresponds to a list with no elements inside
list_(new TestedList(rrclass_)),
+ negative_result_(),
config_elem_(Element::fromJSON("["
"{"
" \"type\": \"test_type\","