|
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
|
|
+// Copyright (C) 2013 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
|
|
|
+//
|
|
|
+// Permission to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute this software for any
|
|
|
+// purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above
|
|
|
+// copyright notice and this permission notice appear in all copies.
|
|
|
+//
|
|
|
+// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND ISC DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH
|
|
|
+// REGARD TO THIS SOFTWARE INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
|
|
|
+// AND FITNESS. IN NO EVENT SHALL ISC BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, DIRECT,
|
|
|
+// INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM
|
|
|
+// LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE
|
|
|
+// OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR
|
|
|
+// PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+/**
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ @page contributorGuide BIND10 Contributor's Guide
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+So you found a bug in BIND10 or developed an extension and want to
|
|
|
+send a patch? Great! This page will explain how to contribute your
|
|
|
+changes and not get disappointed in the process.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Before you start working on a patch or new feature, it is a good idea
|
|
|
+to discuss it first with BIND10 developers. You can post your
|
|
|
+questions to bind10-dev
|
|
|
+(https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind10-dev) for general BIND10
|
|
|
+stuff or to bind10-dhcp
|
|
|
+(https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind10-dhcp) for DHCP specific
|
|
|
+topics. If you prefer to get faster feedback, most BIND10 developers
|
|
|
+hang out at bind10 jabber room
|
|
|
+(xmpp:bind10@conference.jabber.isc.org). Those involved in DHCP also
|
|
|
+use dhcp chatroom (xmpp:dhcp@conference.jabber.isc.org). Feel free to
|
|
|
+drop a note. It is possible that someone else is working on your
|
|
|
+specific issue or perhaps the solution you plan to implement is not
|
|
|
+the best one. Often having 10 minutes talk could save many hours of
|
|
|
+engineering work.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Ok, so you have a patch? Great! Before you submit it, make sure that
|
|
|
+your code compiles. This may seem obvious, but it there's more to
|
|
|
+it. I'm sure you have checked that it compiles on your system, but
|
|
|
+BIND10 is a portable software. Besides Linux, it is being compiled on
|
|
|
+relatively uncommon systems, like OpenBSD or Solaris 11. Will your
|
|
|
+code compile there? Will it work? What about endianess? It is likely
|
|
|
+that you used regular x86, but the software is expected to run on many
|
|
|
+other architectures.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Have your patch conforms to BIND10
|
|
|
+http://bind10.isc.org/wiki/CodingGuidelines? You still can submit
|
|
|
+a patch that does not adhere to it, but it will decrease your
|
|
|
+chances of being accepted. If the deviations are minor, ISC engineer
|
|
|
+that will do the review, will likely fix the issues. However,
|
|
|
+if there are lots of them, reviewer may simply reject the patch
|
|
|
+and ask you to fix it, before resubmitting.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+One of the ground rules in BIND10 development is that every piece of
|
|
|
+code has to be tested. We now have an extensive set of unit-tests for
|
|
|
+almost every line of code. Even if you are fixing something small,
|
|
|
+like a single line fix, it is encouraged to write unit-test for that
|
|
|
+change. That is even more true for new code. If you write a new
|
|
|
+function, method or a class, you definitely should write unit-tests
|
|
|
+for it.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+BIND10 uses google test (gtest) framework as a base for our
|
|
|
+unit-tests. See http://code.google.com/p/googletest/ for details.
|
|
|
+You must have gtest installed or at least compiled before compiling
|
|
|
+BIND10 unit-tests. To enable unit-tests in BIND10
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+./configure --with-gtest=/path/to/your/gtest/dir
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+or
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+./configure --with-gtest-source=/path/to/your/gtest/dir
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Depending on how you compiled or installed (e.g. from sources or using
|
|
|
+some package management system) one of those two switches will find
|
|
|
+gtest. After that you make run unit-tests:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+make check
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+If you happen to add new files or modified Makefiles, it is also a
|
|
|
+good idea to check if you haven't broken distribution process:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+make distcheck
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Once all those are checked and working, feel free to create a ticket
|
|
|
+for your patch (http://bind10.isc.org) or attach your patch to the
|
|
|
+existing ticket if there is one. You may drop a note to bind10 or dhcp
|
|
|
+chatroom saying that you have submitted a patch. Alternatively, you
|
|
|
+may send a note to bind10-dev or bind10-dhcp lists.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Here's the tricky part. One of BIND10 developers will review your
|
|
|
+patch, but it may not happen immediately. Unfortunately, developers
|
|
|
+are usually working under tight schedule, so any extra unplanned
|
|
|
+review work sometimes make take a while. Having said that, we value
|
|
|
+external contributions very much and will do whatever we can to
|
|
|
+review patches in a timely manner. Don't get discouraged if your
|
|
|
+patch is not accepted after first review. To keep the code quality
|
|
|
+high, we use the same review processes for internal code and for
|
|
|
+external patches. It may take several cycles of review/updated patch
|
|
|
+submissions before the code is finally accepted.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+Once the process is almost completed, the developer will likely ask
|
|
|
+you how you would like to be credited. The typical answers are by
|
|
|
+first,last name, by nickname, by company or anonymously. Typically we
|
|
|
+will add a note to ChangeLog. If the contributted feature is big or
|
|
|
+critical for whatever reason, it may be also mentioned in release
|
|
|
+notes.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+*/
|