|
@@ -230,6 +230,17 @@ such that the remote server doesn't support IXFR, we don't have the SOA record
|
|
|
(or the zone at all), we are out of sync, etc. In many of these situations,
|
|
|
AXFR could still work. Therefore we try that one in case it helps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
+% XFRIN_XFR_TRANSFER_FALLBACK_DISABLED suppressing fallback from IXFR to AXFR for %1
|
|
|
+An IXFR transfer of the given zone failed. By default AXFR will be
|
|
|
+tried next, but this fallback is disabled by configuration, so the
|
|
|
+whole transfer attempt failed at that point. If the reason for the
|
|
|
+failure (which should be logged separately) is temporary, this is
|
|
|
+probably harmless or even desired as another IXFR will take place some
|
|
|
+time later (without falling back to the possibly expensive AXFR). If
|
|
|
+this is a permanent error (e.g., some change at the master server
|
|
|
+completely disables IXFR), the secondary zone will eventually expire,
|
|
|
+so the configuration should be changed to allow AXFR.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
% XFRIN_XFR_TRANSFER_PROTOCOL_VIOLATION %1 transfer of zone %2 with %3 failed: %4
|
|
|
The XFR transfer for the given zone has failed due to a protocol
|
|
|
error, such as an unexpected response from the primary server. The
|