Browse Source

[2585] re-enabled auth query tests for in-memory that failed so far.

JINMEI Tatuya 12 years ago
parent
commit
be156ccbf9
1 changed files with 0 additions and 18 deletions
  1. 0 18
      src/bin/auth/tests/query_unittest.cc

+ 0 - 18
src/bin/auth/tests/query_unittest.cc

@@ -1162,12 +1162,6 @@ TEST_P(QueryTest, apexNSMatch) {
 
 // test type any query logic
 TEST_P(QueryTest, exactAnyMatch) {
-    // This is an in-memory specific bug (#2585), until it's fixed we
-    // tentatively skip the test for in-memory
-    if (GetParam() == INMEMORY) {
-        return;
-    }
-
     // find match rrset, omit additional data which has already been provided
     // in the answer section from the additional.
     EXPECT_NO_THROW(query.process(*list_, Name("noglue.example.com"),
@@ -1700,12 +1694,6 @@ TEST_F(QueryTestForMockOnly, badWildcardProof3) {
 }
 
 TEST_P(QueryTest, wildcardNxrrsetWithDuplicateNSEC) {
-    // This is an in-memory specific bug (#2585), until it's fixed we
-    // tentatively skip the test for in-memory
-    if (GetParam() == INMEMORY) {
-        return;
-    }
-
     // NXRRSET on WILDCARD with DNSSEC proof.  We should have SOA, NSEC that
     // proves the NXRRSET and their RRSIGs. In this case we only need one NSEC,
     // which proves both NXDOMAIN and the non existence RRSETs of wildcard.
@@ -1723,12 +1711,6 @@ TEST_P(QueryTest, wildcardNxrrsetWithDuplicateNSEC) {
 }
 
 TEST_P(QueryTest, wildcardNxrrsetWithNSEC) {
-    // This is an in-memory specific bug (#2585), until it's fixed we
-    // tentatively skip the test for in-memory
-    if (GetParam() == INMEMORY) {
-        return;
-    }
-
     // WILDCARD + NXRRSET with DNSSEC proof.  We should have SOA, NSEC that
     // proves the NXRRSET and their RRSIGs. In this case we need two NSEC RRs,
     // one proves NXDOMAIN and the other proves non existence RRSETs of