|
@@ -232,11 +232,9 @@ TEST_F(NameserverAddressStoreTest, NameserverDeletionCheck) {
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(1, nameservers_[1].use_count());
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-/**
|
|
|
- * \short Try lookup on empty store.
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
- * Check if it asks correct questions and it keeps correct internal state.
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
+/// \brief Try lookup on empty store.
|
|
|
+///
|
|
|
+/// Check if it asks correct questions and it keeps correct internal state.
|
|
|
TEST_F(NameserverAddressStoreTest, emptyLookup) {
|
|
|
DerivedNsas nsas(resolver_, 10, 10);
|
|
|
// Ask it a question
|
|
@@ -268,11 +266,9 @@ TEST_F(NameserverAddressStoreTest, emptyLookup) {
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-/**
|
|
|
- * \short Try looking up a zone that does not have any nameservers.
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
- * It should not ask anything and say it is unreachable right away.
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
+/// \brief Try looking up a zone that does not have any nameservers.
|
|
|
+///
|
|
|
+/// It should not ask anything and say it is unreachable right away.
|
|
|
TEST_F(NameserverAddressStoreTest, zoneWithoutNameservers) {
|
|
|
DerivedNsas nsas(resolver_, 10, 10);
|
|
|
// Ask it a question
|
|
@@ -285,13 +281,11 @@ TEST_F(NameserverAddressStoreTest, zoneWithoutNameservers) {
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(NSASCallback::results[0].first);
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-/**
|
|
|
- * \short Try looking up a zone that has only an unreachable nameserver.
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
- * It should be unreachable. Furthermore, subsequent questions for that zone
|
|
|
- * or other zone with the same nameserver should be unreachable right away,
|
|
|
- * without further asking.
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
+/// \brief Try looking up a zone that has only an unreachable nameserver.
|
|
|
+///
|
|
|
+/// It should be unreachable. Furthermore, subsequent questions for that zone
|
|
|
+/// or other zone with the same nameserver should be unreachable right away,
|
|
|
+/// without further asking.
|
|
|
TEST_F(NameserverAddressStoreTest, unreachableNS) {
|
|
|
DerivedNsas nsas(resolver_, 10, 10);
|
|
|
// Ask it a question
|
|
@@ -326,12 +320,10 @@ TEST_F(NameserverAddressStoreTest, unreachableNS) {
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
-/**
|
|
|
- * \short Try to stress it little bit by having multiple zones and nameservers.
|
|
|
- *
|
|
|
- * Does some asking, on a set of zones that share some nameservers, with
|
|
|
- * slower answering, evicting data, etc.
|
|
|
- */
|
|
|
+/// \short Try to stress it little bit by having multiple zones and nameservers.
|
|
|
+///
|
|
|
+/// Does some asking, on a set of zones that share some nameservers, with
|
|
|
+/// slower answering, evicting data, etc.
|
|
|
TEST_F(NameserverAddressStoreTest, CombinedTest) {
|
|
|
// Create small caches, so we get some evictions
|
|
|
DerivedNsas nsas(resolver_, 1, 1);
|