differences.txt 830 B

1234567891011121314151617181920
  1. Differences of Bind 10 to other software
  2. ========================================
  3. BIND 9
  4. ------
  5. TODO: There are definitely more differences than just this.
  6. * When an incoming zone transfer fails, for example because the
  7. received zone doesn't contain a NS record, bind 9 stops serving the
  8. zone and returns SERVFAIL to queries for that zone. Bind 10 still
  9. uses the previous version of zone.
  10. RDATA implementations:
  11. * IN/A: BIND 10 does not accept abbreviated forms of textual IPv4
  12. addresses for class-IN, type-A RDATA. BIND 9 warns about it but
  13. still accepts it as the standard inet_aton() function. Such forms
  14. should actually be NOT accepted per RFC 1035, but BIND 9 accepts them
  15. probably because of compatibility reasons. Until our strict
  16. (and more correct) behavior causes operations issues, we'll keep it.